Year: 2010 Director: Daniel Stamm
Distribution: Eagle Pictures
The mockumentary, as in the genre, have the undoubted advantage of cash and very little cost. And if just cashing in theaters at the end of home videos and company are part of the expense.
Reverend Marcus Cotton was a preacher who has lost his faith, especially due to the fact that he had seen many, many cases of possession but turned out to be false. When called for yet another girl in Louisiana who is believed to be possessed by the devil, Marcus puts on a film crew and decides to prove that the so-called devil does not exist. Only suggestion, he said. Maybe, but the girl is able to climb on the walls ...
it comes to marketing, at the beginning of the review, because, unfortunately, to say there is little else sull'ennesima production sly. The mockumentary should gradually become more interesting with the vision. When we speak of "The Blair Witch Project", for example, there is the growing tension, the frightening environment, the final effect. In "Lake Mungo " to make another one, this is called sudden twists in the tale, the plot well constructed, with interesting background. And even in the most technical film, but who have used the same trick as narrative " Rec " one is impressed by the effectiveness of the surrender. In the film Daniel Stamm, however, we not only have a rather predictable plot, but also a bad staging. Are not spared the classic errors of form, therefore, as shots blurred, shaky footage, twilight nearly ubiquitous, so as to make a vision already heavy, even more exhausting.
But what Daniel Stamm ago, is making a mistake ahead of the film. That is the basic idea. In "The Last Exorcism" is not about a documentary made by a priest on a real possession true, it would be interesting to see. It is said instead of a fake documentary about a reverend false is a fake exorcism on a girl possessed. And considering all this we discover in the first ten minutes of film, the question is, why continue to stay in front of the screen?
There would have to say one last thing, which covers the surprise ending with the possibility of a sequel. But we avoid because this is not cinema, it's just marketing.
Diego Altobelli (11/2010)
Reverend Marcus Cotton was a preacher who has lost his faith, especially due to the fact that he had seen many, many cases of possession but turned out to be false. When called for yet another girl in Louisiana who is believed to be possessed by the devil, Marcus puts on a film crew and decides to prove that the so-called devil does not exist. Only suggestion, he said. Maybe, but the girl is able to climb on the walls ...
it comes to marketing, at the beginning of the review, because, unfortunately, to say there is little else sull'ennesima production sly. The mockumentary should gradually become more interesting with the vision. When we speak of "The Blair Witch Project", for example, there is the growing tension, the frightening environment, the final effect. In "Lake Mungo " to make another one, this is called sudden twists in the tale, the plot well constructed, with interesting background. And even in the most technical film, but who have used the same trick as narrative " Rec " one is impressed by the effectiveness of the surrender. In the film Daniel Stamm, however, we not only have a rather predictable plot, but also a bad staging. Are not spared the classic errors of form, therefore, as shots blurred, shaky footage, twilight nearly ubiquitous, so as to make a vision already heavy, even more exhausting.
But what Daniel Stamm ago, is making a mistake ahead of the film. That is the basic idea. In "The Last Exorcism" is not about a documentary made by a priest on a real possession true, it would be interesting to see. It is said instead of a fake documentary about a reverend false is a fake exorcism on a girl possessed. And considering all this we discover in the first ten minutes of film, the question is, why continue to stay in front of the screen? There would have to say one last thing, which covers the surprise ending with the possibility of a sequel. But we avoid because this is not cinema, it's just marketing.
Diego Altobelli (11/2010)
0 comments:
Post a Comment